No subject

1. the VIC initialization
2. the sdhci drive strength
3. the presence of a second i2c port
4. the CLKDIV0_ARM_MASK

The rest of the non-board support code is identical in those two
directories.

> It does however mean that mach-s3c6400 and mach-s3c6410 are not heavily
> populated with machines, especially as the intended new Openmoko device
> never appeared.

Given the above, and the "mass population" hasn't happened, maybe part
of the solution to the duplicated header file problem is to start
combining some of these directories?