[PATCH 3/6] OMAP4: Re-arrange the low level debug code
Shilimkar, Santosh
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Thu Dec 10 06:27:18 EST 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sshtylyov at ru.mvista.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 4:06 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: tony at atomide.com; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux at arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] OMAP4: Re-arrange the low level debug code
>
> Hello.
>
> Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
> > On OMAP4430 the UART3 base address is different than that on OMAP3.
> > Because of this existing code needs additional #ifdef'ry to accommodate
> > that code. Hence this patch separates it. Also UART3 base address is
> > fixed for OMAP4430 in this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> >
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/debug-macro.S b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/include/mach/debug-macro.S
> > index e9f255d..b2b4b29 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/debug-macro.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/debug-macro.S
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> > add \rx, \rx, #0x00004000 @ UART 3
> > #endif
> >
> > -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
> > +#elif CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> >
>
> Why you've dropped defined()? This doesn't seem right as it should
> cause error when CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3=n...
Before omap4 support was added, it was as above. Now when I decided
to go back and spilt it I changed it. How the ARCH flag will be
n ? It will be either 0 or 1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list