[PATCH v12 4/6] thermal: khadas-mcu-fan: Add fan config from platform data Add regulator support

[Ronald Claveau]

On 9/17/26 10:13 AM, sashiko-bot at kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] thermal: khadas-mcu-fan: OF node reference leak in probe
> --
> 
> commit c3a0644be46518f47124644a90235d26979c4299
> Author: Ronald Claveau <linux-kernel-dev at aliel.fr>
> 
> thermal: khadas-mcu-fan: Add fan config from platform data Add regulator support
> 
> This commit introduces variant-specific platform data including control
> registers and duty-cycle levels, while also bumping the maximum level.
> It optionally acquires and enables a fan regulator supply at probe time
> to handle boards that gate fan power.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c b/drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c
>> index 21b3d0a71bd0d..1da639d054971 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -76,22 +82,71 @@ static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops khadas_mcu_fan_cooling_ops = {
>>  static int khadas_mcu_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> +	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
>>  	struct khadas_mcu *mcu = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>>  	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	struct khadas_mcu_fan_ctx *ctx;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> +
>> +	if (!dev->of_node)
>> +		dev->of_node = of_node_get(dev->parent->of_node);
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this leak the OF node reference? The probe function explicitly
> acquires the node with of_node_get() and assigns it to dev->of_node,
> but there is no corresponding cleanup mechanism.
> 
> Since there is no .remove callback or devm action registered to call
> of_node_put(), and the driver core does not automatically drop
> references assigned directly to dev->of_node in this manner, the
> reference count appears to leak every time the driver is unbound.
> 

The if statement make it safe to not be incremented when not needed. At
the end the `platform_device_release` will call the `of_node_put`.


-- 
Best regards,
Ronald