[PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: Add clk measure support

[Ronald Claveau]

Hi Jian,

On 4/20/26 5:25 AM, Jian Hu wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
> 
> 
> Thanks for your review.
> 
> On 4/17/2026 5:48 PM, Ronald Claveau wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>
>> Hello Jian,
>>
>> On 4/15/26 10:33 AM, Jian Hu via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Jian Hu <jian.hu at amlogic.com>
>>>
>>> Add the clock measure device to the T7 SoC family.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian.hu at amlogic.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi b/arch/
>>> arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>> index 7fe72c94ed62..cec2ea74850d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>> @@ -701,6 +701,11 @@ pwm_ao_cd: pwm at 60000 {
>>>                                status = "disabled";
>>>                        };
>>>
>>> +                     clock-measurer at 48000 {
>>> +                             compatible = "amlogic,t7-clk-measure";
>>> +                             reg = <0x0 0x48000 0x0 0x1c>;
>>> +                     };
>>> +
>> Can you please order by reg, it should be between pwm_ao_gh and pwm_ab.
>> Thank you.
> 
> 
> According to the "Order of Nodes" chapter in Documentation/devicetree/
> bindings/dts-coding-style.rst,
> 
> nodes of the same type should be grouped together, and this takes higher
> priority.
> 
> So I have placed the clock-measure node after all PWM nodes to avoid
> splitting the PWM group.
> 

Thanks for your answer.

The documentation says nodes "shall be ordered by unit address" as the
primary rule.
The grouping by type is described as an alternative ("Alternatively"),
applicable to some subarchitectures, not as a rule that takes higher
priority.

So to me, I understand it as, unless your subarchitecture has an
established convention of grouping PWM nodes together, ordering by reg
remains the correct default here. And, in my opinion, sticking to a
single sorting method improves readability.


-- 
Best regards,
Ronald