[PATCH 1/6] media: ar0521: Refactor ar0521_power_off()

[Ricardo Ribalda]

Hi Dan

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 at 14:54, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:13:48PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > Factor out all the power off logic, except the clk_disable_unprepare(),
> > to a new function __ar0521_power_off().
> >
> > This allows ar0521_power_on() to explicitly clean-out the clock during
> > the error-path.
> >
> > The following smatch warning is fixed:
> > drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c:912 ar0521_power_on() warn: 'sensor->extclk' from clk_prepare_enable() not released on lines: 912.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda at chromium.org>
> > ---
>
> It's better to just ignore false positives...  The problem here is that
> Smatch can't track that to_ar0521_dev(dev_get_drvdata(dev))->sensor is the same
> as sensor.  What I could do is say that "this frees *something* unknown" so
> let's silence the warning."
>
> The problem is that check_unwind.c is not very granular.  It just marks things
> as allocated and freed.  I could make it more granular so the free and the
> alloc have to match.  Or we could match based on the type.  This frees a
> "struct ar0521_dev" so mark all those as freed in the caller.
>
> >  drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
> > index 09331cf95c62..2c528db31ba6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
> > @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static const struct initial_reg {
> >            be(0x0707)), /* 3F44: couple k factor 2 */
> >  };
> >
> > -static int ar0521_power_off(struct device *dev)
> > +static void __ar0521_power_off(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >       struct v4l2_subdev *sd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >       struct ar0521_dev *sensor = to_ar0521_dev(sd);
> > @@ -850,6 +850,16 @@ static int ar0521_power_off(struct device *dev)
> >               if (sensor->supplies[i])
> >                       regulator_disable(sensor->supplies[i]);
> >       }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ar0521_power_off(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +     struct v4l2_subdev *sd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +     struct ar0521_dev *sensor = to_ar0521_dev(sd);
> > +
> > +     clk_disable_unprepare(sensor->extclk);
> > +     __ar0521_power_off(dev);
>
> You had intended to remove the clk_disable_unprepare() from __ar0521_power_off()
> but forgot so these are double unprepares.

Ups, thanks for catching it :)

Will send as v2, unless you fix it in smatch first ;P

Regards!

>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > +
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -908,7 +918,8 @@ static int ar0521_power_on(struct device *dev)
> >
> >       return 0;
> >  off:
> > -     ar0521_power_off(dev);
> > +     clk_disable_unprepare(sensor->extclk);
> > +     __ar0521_power_off(dev);
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >
> > --
> > 2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog
> >



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda