[PATCH 2/4] irqchip/meson-gpio: support more than 8 channels gpio irq line
qianggui.song
Qianggui.Song at amlogic.com
Mon Jan 10 04:27:03 PST 2022
On 1/8/22 6:37 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 08:42:16 +0000,
> Qianggui Song <qianggui.song at amlogic.com> wrote:
>>
>> Current meson gpio irqchip driver only support 8 channels for gpio irq
>> line, later chips may have more then 8 channels, so need to modify code
>> to support more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qianggui Song <qianggui.song at amlogic.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
>> index d90ff0b92480..6a7b4fb13452 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>
>> -#define NUM_CHANNEL 8
>> #define MAX_INPUT_MUX 256
>>
>> #define REG_EDGE_POL 0x00
>> @@ -60,6 +59,7 @@ struct irq_ctl_ops {
>>
>> struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
>> unsigned int nr_hwirq;
>> + unsigned int channel_num;
>
> For consistency, please name this nr_channels.
Okay
>
>> bool support_edge_both;
>> unsigned int edge_both_offset;
>> unsigned int edge_single_offset;
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
>> .edge_single_offset = 0, \
>> .pol_low_offset = 16, \
>> .pin_sel_mask = 0xff, \
>> + .channel_num = 8, \
>>
>> #define INIT_MESON_A1_COMMON_DATA(irqs) \
>> INIT_MESON_COMMON(irqs, meson_a1_gpio_irq_init, \
>> @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
>> .edge_single_offset = 8, \
>> .pol_low_offset = 0, \
>> .pin_sel_mask = 0x7f, \
>> + .channel_num = 8, \
>>
>> static const struct meson_gpio_irq_params meson8_params = {
>> INIT_MESON8_COMMON_DATA(134)
>> @@ -136,8 +138,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id meson_irq_gpio_matches[] = {
>> struct meson_gpio_irq_controller {
>> const struct meson_gpio_irq_params *params;
>> void __iomem *base;
>> - u32 channel_irqs[NUM_CHANNEL];
>> - DECLARE_BITMAP(channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL);
>> + u32 *channel_irqs;
>> + unsigned long *channel_map;
>> + u8 channel_num;
>
> Same thing. Though this is completely superfluous, see below.
I will remove this variable
>
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -207,8 +210,8 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags);
>>
>> /* Find a free channel */
>> - idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL);
>> - if (idx >= NUM_CHANNEL) {
>> + idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, ctl->channel_num);
>> + if (idx >= ctl->channel_num) {
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags);
>> pr_err("No channel available\n");
>> return -ENOSPC;
>> @@ -447,13 +450,25 @@ static int meson_gpio_irq_parse_dt(struct device_node *node, struct meson_gpio_i
>>
>> ctl->params = match->data;
>>
>> + ctl->channel_num = ctl->params->channel_num;
>
> Since you already have a pointer to params, why do you need to
> duplicate this information?
will remove it next patch
>
>> + ctl->channel_irqs = kcalloc(ctl->channel_num,
>> + sizeof(*ctl->channel_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ctl->channel_irqs)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ctl->channel_map = bitmap_zalloc(ctl->params->channel_num, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ctl->channel_map) {
>> + kfree(ctl->channel_irqs);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(node,
>> "amlogic,channel-interrupts",
>> ctl->channel_irqs,
>> - NUM_CHANNEL,
>> - NUM_CHANNEL);
>> + ctl->channel_num,
>> + ctl->channel_num);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - pr_err("can't get %d channel interrupts\n", NUM_CHANNEL);
>> + pr_err("can't get %d channel interrupts\n", ctl->channel_num);
>> return ret;
>
> You are now leaking the bitmap and channel_map allocations.
will fix it next patch
>
> M.
>
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list