[PATCH v4 05/13] pinctrl: samsung: Switch to use for_each_gpiochip_node() helper

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:22:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/04/2022 12:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Switch the code to use for_each_gpiochip_node() helper.

(...)

> >  /*
> >   * Iterate over all driver pin banks to find one matching the name of node,
> >   * skipping optional "-gpio" node suffix. When found, assign node to the bank.
> >   */
> > -static void samsung_banks_of_node_get(struct device *dev,
> > -				      struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d,
> > -				      struct device_node *node)
> > +static void samsung_banks_node_get(struct device *dev, struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d)
> 
> This is worth simplification anyway, so please split it to separate patch.

Not sure what to do and why it worth an additional churn.

> >  {
> >  	const char *suffix = "-gpio-bank";
> >  	struct samsung_pin_bank *bank;
> > -	struct device_node *child;
> > +	struct fwnode_handle *child;
> >  	/* Pin bank names are up to 4 characters */
> >  	char node_name[20];
> >  	unsigned int i;
> > @@ -1038,17 +1037,17 @@ static void samsung_banks_of_node_get(struct device *dev,
> >  			continue;
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
> > -			if (!of_find_property(child, "gpio-controller", NULL))
> > -				continue;
> 
> This does not look equivalent. There are nodes without this property.

Not sure I understand why not. The macro checks for the property and
iterates over nodes that have this property.

Can you elaborate, please?

> > -			if (of_node_name_eq(child, node_name))
> > +		for_each_gpiochip_node(dev, child) {
> > +			struct device_node *np = to_of_node(child);
> > +
> > +			if (of_node_name_eq(np, node_name))
> >  				break;
> > -			else if (of_node_name_eq(child, bank->name))
> > +			if (of_node_name_eq(np, bank->name))
> >  				break;
> >  		}
> 
> This patch has to wait till someone provides you a tested-by. I might do
> it around next week.

Fine with me, I will drop it from my repo for now.

Thanks for review!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko