[PATCH 0/3] Ensure Low period of SCL is correct
Neil Armstrong
narmstrong at baylibre.com
Mon Apr 4 01:01:03 PDT 2022
Hi,
On 29/03/2022 00:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, 21:37 Kevin Hilman, <khilman at baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> Lucas Tanure <tanure at linux.com> writes:
>>
>>> The default duty cycle of 33% is less than the required
>>> by the I2C specs for the LOW period of the SCL clock.
>>>
>>> So, for 100Khz or less, use 50%H/50%L duty cycle, and
>>> for the clock above 100Khz, use 40%H/60%L duty cycle.
>>> That ensures the low period of SCL is always more than
>>> the minimum required by the specs at any given frequency.
>>
>> Thanks for the fixes!
>>
>> This is going to affect all SoCs, so ould you please summarize how your
>> changes were tested, and on which SoCs & boards?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kevin
>
> Hi,
>
> I only tested against the vim3 board, measured the bus with a Saleae
> logic pro 16.
> The measurements were with 100k, 400k, and a few in-between frequencies.
Thanks, it's a great addition to have !
>
> Is that enough?
A test on GXL/GXM (VIM1 or VIM2) & GXBB (Odroid-C2) devices is lacking before we
can merge this.
If I find some time, I'll have a try, but everyone is welcome testing this serie
and report if it still works fine for them.
Vyacheslav, do you think you can test on your JetHub devices ? it would validate GXL & AXG.
Neil
>
> Thanks
> Lucas
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list