[PATCH v3] af_rxrpc: Keep rxrpc_call pointers in a hashtable

[David Howells]

Tim Smith <tim at electronghost.co.uk> wrote:

> Well the thing is, I don't actually care whether I'm adding 0x00000001 or
> 0x01000000. I don't even care if it (key) overflows. Is there a good reason
> to take the potential hit of an endian swap?

Well, most of the variation might be in the higher order bits that don't
contribute to the hash bucket selected.

David