[PATCH v3] af_rxrpc: Keep rxrpc_call pointers in a hashtable
dhowells at redhat.com
Thu Feb 27 17:08:32 EST 2014
Tim Smith <tim at electronghost.co.uk> wrote:
> Well the thing is, I don't actually care whether I'm adding 0x00000001 or
> 0x01000000. I don't even care if it (key) overflows. Is there a good reason
> to take the potential hit of an endian swap?
Well, most of the variation might be in the higher order bits that don't
contribute to the hash bucket selected.
More information about the linux-afs