[LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal
Eric Luehrsen
ericluehrsen at hotmail.com
Thu May 11 21:09:31 PDT 2017
I read this on going thread and ... (sigh).
"Good fences make good neighbors." Robert Frost
People don't like rules and that could be even more true with open
source work groups. However, a good set of _limited_ rules can make life
easier. You may focus on important work or joyful recreation while not
worrying about accidental trespasses.
I was trying to hold back a thought as formal as "bylaws" but perhaps
that is really the best way. That is ignore all the thoughts of what to
name the community, who would handle the accounts, and where to point
the DNS to. First thing and prerequisite to all others is a set of
governing principals for a yet unnamed community. This community is for
members who share a common affliction that they cannot help themselves
but hack on embedded networking software.
This applies not only to the voting members, but to the interactions
respective to the wider community of contributers and power users. Much
of OpenWrt/LEDE progress, interest, relevance, and value is made by
these members of the wider community. The size of the sphere of
influence and the community's self worth are determined by issues such
as: on-boarding of voting members, on-boarding of committing members,
separating requirement of commits from votes, transparency of decision
making, email accounts, other privileges that over emphasize badge of
authority, and general attitude of the core voting members.
Such schisms occur in all organizations (business and nations). When it
happens the first time, then it is a leaning opportunity. If the
opportunity is ignored, or the solution glosses over the details of the
underlying root cause, then the situation will repeat. A repeat event is
more damaging to the credibility of an organization than the first one.
- Eric
More information about the Lede-dev
mailing list