[LEDE-DEV] impressed by progress on odhcpd and procd and elsewhere.

[Hans Dedecker]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Philip Prindeville
<philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Stijn Tintel <stijn at linux-ipv6.be> wrote:
>>
>> On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and
>>> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users
>>> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11).
>> Is this only a problem for Android users? I ran into a bug a couple of
>> times where dnsmasq simply did not reply to queries sent to IPv6
>> link-local addresses. I had this problem on my ERLs, it went away at
>> some point, then it came back, and while testing now, it seems to work
>> fine again. So unfortunately I have no idea why it happened, but that is
>> the only reason I configured a non-ULA DNS server on these devices.
>>
>> It wasn't really a problem on my Linux clients, but using Android with
>> IPv6 DNS servers that don't reply just isn't usable, even if the IPv4
>> DNS servers work just fine. Each connection attempt had a ~12 second
>> delay or so.
>>
>> Stijn
>
> Somewhat off-topic, but I’m trying to update the isc-dhcp scripts to work (they don’t).
>
> Is there documentation for what the UCI config for odhcpd looks like?  I might be able to use the same configuration (or something pretty close to it) for synthesizing the /etc/dhcpd.conf file for ISC-DHCP.
The README file of odhcpd has a description of the UCI config
(https://git.lede-project.org/?p=project/odhcpd.git;a=blob;f=README;h=8c3b12c6c245c6b58cb8ac9dddf146144571af8c;hb=HEAD)

Hans
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Philip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev