[LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

L. D. Pinney ldpinney at gmail.com
Sun Jun 12 11:23:25 PDT 2016


Much like the convention of prefixing your subject line with [PATCH]
messages like this should be required to have a prefix such as
[DRIVEL] for effective filtering

lede integration issues ??

I don't see why there IS an issue CeroWrt died for good reason(s) ... such as :

Low return on investment by it's corporate sponsorship.
Only supported ONE router (and a few subtypes thereof)
Let the detrius settle to the bottom where it belongs.

I am probably the only user of the gnugol package. :(
There is most likely a good reason for that :)

fdisk doesn't support GPT ??

>From the lede 'menuconfig'
Base system > busybox
Linux System Utilities  --->

[*] fdisk
[*]   Write support
[ ]     Support AIX disklabels (NEW)
[ ]     Support SGI disklabels (NEW)
[ ]     Support SUN disklabels (NEW)
[ ]     Support BSD disklabels (NEW)
[*]     Support GPT disklabels
[*]     Support expert mode

So what the standard LEDE images don't support fdisk with GPT one can
easily format his so called large USB drive on a desktop...
Why should a wireless router support this by default?

We used lighttpd in cerowrt as it was tons faster than uhttpd.

"tons faster" ...really is the readership of LEDE-DEV primarily made
of teenage girls?

Can you provide evidence to suport this ...

Simply put .. It's a memory hog for a typical router ... how well does
it work with 32M or even 64M of RAM?

Are you suggesting LEDE drop support for 4M flash / 32M RAM routers in
favor of using lighttpd as the default?

defining what lede's use cases will be 5-10 years in the future

Really LEDE should have a five year plan much like the Communist Party
of China ?


On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> happy to see cake working today! thx all!
>
> In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10:
>
> A) We have flent's tc-iterate.c as a fast, lightweight means of
> polling fq_codel, pie, cake stats (as the shell in openwrt doesn't
> support a subsecond sleep) for openwrt.
>
> (However this package and code is in need of iteration to support
> polling the new stats presented in the fq_codel for wifi sysfs code.)
>
> Having something like this working is essential to analyze the real
> performance and correctness of the new implementations on the low end
> hardware.
>
> B) I am probably the only user of the gnugol package. :(
>
> C) I really need to sync the isochronous code with what avery has upstream
>
> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe
>
> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5
> radios, if anything?
>
> E) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/gdisk
>
> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
> think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable
> tool. Is there a replacement in lede that handles GPT? If not - this
> is an old gdisk port to openwrt that I used to use.
>
> F) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/cerowrt-scripts
> was a tool we used to measure latency under load directly on the
> router...
>
> some other packages that might be worth upstreaming, or putting in
> another repo or updating in ceropackages
>
> owamp: lets us measure ping times very precisely. (requires good ntp)
> ntpsec - a vastly hardened full fledged ntp fork https://www.ntpsec.org/
> scamper - two other measurement tools
> shaperprobe
>
> ?
>
> G) We used lighttpd in cerowrt as it was tons faster than uhttpd and
> flexible enough to also do local web serving. can it (or ngnix) be
> substituted for uhttpd? Or has uhttpd got faster?
>
> H) Anyone working on go or rust for lede? hugo and ipfs and all the
> other blockchain related distributed web bits looks like fun...
>
> It looks like the static linking in go is a deal-killer
>
> https://github.com/GeertJohan/openwrt-go/issues/2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list