RFC: Enable Sashiko code reviews for kexec at lists.infradead.org

[Mike Rapoport]

Hi Baoquan,

On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 01:52:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/02/26 at 07:34am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 01:27:34PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
> > > Hi kexec@ mailing list and maintainers,
> > > 
> > > I would like to enable Sashiko code reviews for patches sent to the
> > > kexec mailing list. I have found it useful for patches I have sent and
> > > reviewed on the kvm and linux-pci mailing lists, which have Sashiko
> > > enabled.
> > > 
> > > I sent a pull request to Sashiko to add kexec here:
> > > 
> > >   https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/474
> > 
> > diff --git a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> > index e6e4fb57f..e9ad97708 100644
> > --- a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> > +++ b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> > @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ reply_to_author = false
> >  cc_individuals = false
> >  cc = ["Chuck Lever <cel at kernel.org>", "Jeff Layton <jlayton at kernel.org>", "Anna Schumaker <anna at kernel.org>"]
> >  
> > +[subsystems.kexec]
> > +lists = ["kexec at lists.infradead.org"]
> > +reply_to_author = true
> > +send_positive_review = true
> > 
> > Do we really want those?
> 
> Some components don't want to CC list, then other people are welcome to
> drop any comment during reviewing, while cc to maintainer and author
> looks good to me. Just an input, no objection to any move.

Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant do we really want extra emails saying
sashiko is happy?

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.