RFC: Enable Sashiko code reviews for kexec at lists.infradead.org

[Baoquan He]

On 09/02/26 at 07:34am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 01:27:34PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
> > Hi kexec@ mailing list and maintainers,
> > 
> > I would like to enable Sashiko code reviews for patches sent to the
> > kexec mailing list. I have found it useful for patches I have sent and
> > reviewed on the kvm and linux-pci mailing lists, which have Sashiko
> > enabled.
> > 
> > I sent a pull request to Sashiko to add kexec here:
> > 
> >   https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/474
> 
> diff --git a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> index e6e4fb57f..e9ad97708 100644
> --- a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> +++ b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ reply_to_author = false
>  cc_individuals = false
>  cc = ["Chuck Lever <cel at kernel.org>", "Jeff Layton <jlayton at kernel.org>", "Anna Schumaker <anna at kernel.org>"]
>  
> +[subsystems.kexec]
> +lists = ["kexec at lists.infradead.org"]
> +reply_to_author = true
> +send_positive_review = true
> 
> Do we really want those?

Some components don't want to CC list, then other people are welcome to
drop any comment during reviewing, while cc to maintainer and author
looks good to me. Just an input, no objection to any move.

> 
> +cc = ["kexec at lists.infradead.org"]
> 
> Please add me here.
> 
>  [subsystems.kvm]
>  lists = ["kvm at vger.kernel.org"]
>  reply_to_author = true
>  
> > I wanted to start this thread to call attention to that pull request
> > and see if there are any objections, or opinions about how it should
> > be configured.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > --David
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.