[PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot

[Coiby Xu]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary
>> for this case.
>
>Right, especially if the two patches do one logical thing - removing
>__set_memory_prot(). Then one patch is better.

I see, thanks for the explanation!

>
>> Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit
>> message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no
>> need for me to re-send your new patch as v2?
>
>Yap, I can queue it, no need.

Great, thanks for taking care of the patch!

>
>Thx.
>
>-- 
>Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
>
>https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
>

-- 
Best regards,
Coiby