[PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary
> for this case.

Right, especially if the two patches do one logical thing - removing
__set_memory_prot(). Then one patch is better.

> Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit
> message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no
> need for me to re-send your new patch as v2?

Yap, I can queue it, no need.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette