[PATCH 3/3] makedumpfile: Add support for MM randomization
Baoquan He
bhe at redhat.com
Thu Sep 29 21:56:20 PDT 2016
Hi Atsushi,
Thanks a lot for your reviewing!
I am very sorry for so late response, just focused on other issue
earlier.
On 08/31/16 at 07:56am, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
> Hello Baoquan,
>
> Thanks for your work, I have some comments below.
>
> >In kernel patchset "x86/mm: memory area address KASLR", PAGE_OFFSET,
> >VMALLOC_START and VMEMMAP_START are all randomized. Please check below
> >link:
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/692289/
> >
> >And these need be exported into vmcoreinfo and tell makedumpfile. In
> >this patch get and handle them to support MM randomization.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> >---
> > arch/x86_64.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
> > makedumpfile.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > makedumpfile.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86_64.c b/arch/x86_64.c
> >index ddf7be6..ff787cc 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86_64.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86_64.c
> >@@ -146,8 +146,9 @@ get_machdep_info_x86_64(void)
> > return TRUE;
> > }
> >
> >-int
> >-get_versiondep_info_x86_64(void)
> >+#define VMALLOC_SIZE (0x200000000000)
> >+#define VMEMMAP_SIZE (0x10000000000)
> >+int get_versiondep_info_x86_64(void)
> > {
> > /*
> > * On linux-2.6.26, MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is changed to 44 from 40.
> >@@ -159,22 +160,13 @@ get_versiondep_info_x86_64(void)
> > else
> > info->max_physmem_bits = _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_2_6_31;
> >
> >- if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 27))
> >- info->page_offset = __PAGE_OFFSET_ORIG;
> >- else
> >- info->page_offset = __PAGE_OFFSET_2_6_27;
> >+ info->page_offset = NUMBER(page_offset);
> >
> >- if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31)) {
> >- info->vmalloc_start = VMALLOC_START_ORIG;
> >- info->vmalloc_end = VMALLOC_END_ORIG;
> >- info->vmemmap_start = VMEMMAP_START_ORIG;
> >- info->vmemmap_end = VMEMMAP_END_ORIG;
> >- } else {
> >- info->vmalloc_start = VMALLOC_START_2_6_31;
> >- info->vmalloc_end = VMALLOC_END_2_6_31;
> >- info->vmemmap_start = VMEMMAP_START_2_6_31;
> >- info->vmemmap_end = VMEMMAP_END_2_6_31;
> >- }
>
> These *_END_* are no longer used, it's better to remove the definitions
> of them.
Seems is_vmalloc_addr_x86_64 still needs VMALLOC_END and VMEMMAP_END to
make a judgement.
>
> >+
> >+ info->vmalloc_start = NUMBER(vmalloc_start);
> >+ info->vmalloc_end = info->vmalloc_start + VMALLOC_SIZE - 1;
> >+ info->vmemmap_start = NUMBER(vmemmap_start);
> >+ info->vmemmap_end = info->vmemmap_start + VMEMMAP_SIZE - 1;
> >
> > return TRUE;
> > }
> >diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
> >index 2713f8a..6b0c6ab 100644
> >--- a/makedumpfile.c
> >+++ b/makedumpfile.c
> >@@ -1985,6 +1985,7 @@ get_value_for_old_linux(void)
> > NUMBER(PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE) =
> > PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE_v2_6_39_to_latest_version;
> > }
> >+ ERRMSG("info->kernel_version=%d\n", info->kernel_version);
>
> Is this just a debug message ?
Yes, sorry for this. Will remove it.
>
> > #ifdef __x86_64__
> > if (NUMBER(KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE) == NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) {
> > if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 26))
> >@@ -1992,6 +1993,26 @@ get_value_for_old_linux(void)
> > else
> > NUMBER(KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE) = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE_2_6_26;
> > }
> >+ if (NUMBER(page_offset) == NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) {
> >+ if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 27))
> >+ NUMBER(page_offset) = __PAGE_OFFSET_ORIG;
> >+ else
> >+ NUMBER(page_offset) = __PAGE_OFFSET_2_6_27;
> >+ }
> >+ if (NUMBER(vmalloc_start) == NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) {
> >+ if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31)) {
> >+ NUMBER(vmalloc_start) = VMALLOC_START_ORIG;
> >+ } else {
> >+ NUMBER(vmalloc_start) = VMALLOC_START_2_6_31;
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ if (NUMBER(vmemmap_start) == NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) {
> >+ if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31))
> >+ NUMBER(vmemmap_start) = VMEMMAP_START_ORIG;
> >+ else
> >+ NUMBER(vmemmap_start) = VMEMMAP_START_2_6_31;
> >+ }
> >+
>
> (I should have said this when you post the early kaslr patch.)
> This logic is only for x86_64, I don't like to take it out to
> here(general pass) with #ifdef. Is there any necessity to write
> this code here ?
Yes, you are right. I plan to put them into get_versiondep_info_x86_64.
>
> > #endif
> > if (SIZE(pageflags) == NOT_FOUND_STRUCTURE) {
> > if (info->kernel_version >= KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 27))
> >@@ -2249,6 +2270,9 @@ write_vmcoreinfo_data(void)
> >
> > WRITE_NUMBER("PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE", PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE);
> > WRITE_NUMBER("KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE", KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE);
> >+ WRITE_NUMBER("PAGE_OFFSET", page_offset);
> >+ WRITE_NUMBER("VMALLOC_START", vmalloc_start);
> >+ WRITE_NUMBER("VMEMMAP_START", vmemmap_start);
> >
> > WRITE_NUMBER("HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR", HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> >
> >@@ -2595,6 +2619,9 @@ read_vmcoreinfo(void)
> >
> > READ_NUMBER("PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE", PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE);
> > READ_NUMBER("KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE", KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE);
> >+ READ_NUMBER("PAGE_OFFSET", page_offset);
> >+ READ_NUMBER("VMALLOC_START", vmalloc_start);
> >+ READ_NUMBER("VMEMMAP_START", vmemmap_start);
> >
> > READ_NUMBER("HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR", HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> >
> >@@ -3826,7 +3853,7 @@ initial(void)
> > debug_info = TRUE;
> > }
> >
> >- info->kernel_version = get_kernel_version(info.release);
> >+ info->kernel_version = get_kernel_version(info->release);
>
> Why don't you write "info->release" in [PATCH 1/3] ?
Yes, will do.
Thanks for your comments and great suggestions!
Thanks
Baoquan
More information about the kexec
mailing list