[PATCH v3 1/8] arm64: identify PHYS_OFFSET correctly
Pratyush Anand
panand at redhat.com
Tue Sep 27 08:49:51 PDT 2016
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:03 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
<takahiro.akashi at linaro.org> wrote:
> Due to the kernel patch[1], the current code will not be able to identify
[1] is mentioned in cover letter only, not here.
> the correct value of PHYS_OFFSET if some "reserved" memory region, which
> is likely to be UEFI runtime services code/data, exists at an address below
> the first "System RAM" regions.
>
> This patch fixes this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> ---
> kexec/arch/arm64/iomem.h | 7 +++++++
> kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kexec/arch/arm64/iomem.h
>
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/iomem.h b/kexec/arch/arm64/iomem.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7fd66eb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/iomem.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +#ifndef IOMEM_H
> +#define IOMEM_H
> +
> +#define SYSTEM_RAM "System RAM\n"
> +#define IOMEM_RESERVED "reserved\n"
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
> index 7183dac..bc96c76 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include "crashdump-arm64.h"
> #include "dt-ops.h"
> #include "fs2dt.h"
> +#include "iomem.h"
> #include "kexec-syscall.h"
> #include "arch/options.h"
>
> @@ -465,18 +466,28 @@ void add_segment(struct kexec_info *info, const void *buf, size_t bufsz,
> * get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb - Helper for get_memory_ranges_iomem.
> */
>
> +static int count_memory_ranges;
IMHO improving definition of kexec_iomem_for_each_line() and
callback() for handling NULL match case would have been a better
choice than introducing a new static variable. callback() can return
-ve in case of error, 0 in case of no match and 1 in case of (one)
match.
~Pratyush
> +
> static int get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb(void *data, int nr, char *str,
> unsigned long long base, unsigned long long length)
> {
> struct memory_range *r;
>
> - if (nr >= KEXEC_SEGMENT_MAX)
> + if (count_memory_ranges >= KEXEC_SEGMENT_MAX)
> return -1;
>
> - r = (struct memory_range *)data + nr;
> - r->type = RANGE_RAM;
> + r = (struct memory_range *)data + count_memory_ranges;
> +
> + if (!strncmp(str, SYSTEM_RAM, strlen(SYSTEM_RAM)))
> + r->type = RANGE_RAM;
> + else if (!strncmp(str, IOMEM_RESERVED, strlen(IOMEM_RESERVED)))
> + r->type = RANGE_RESERVED;
> + else
> + return 0;
> +
> r->start = base;
> r->end = base + length - 1;
> + count_memory_ranges++;
>
> set_phys_offset(r->start);
>
> @@ -493,9 +504,10 @@ static int get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb(void *data, int nr, char *str,
> static int get_memory_ranges_iomem(struct memory_range *array,
> unsigned int *count)
> {
> - *count = kexec_iomem_for_each_line("System RAM\n",
> - get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb, array);
> + count_memory_ranges = 0;
> + kexec_iomem_for_each_line(NULL, get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb, array);
>
> + *count = count_memory_ranges;
> if (!*count) {
> dbgprintf("%s: failed: No RAM found.\n", __func__);
> return -EFAILED;
> --
> 2.9.0
>
More information about the kexec
mailing list