[PATCH] x86/efi: skip bgrt init for kexec reboot
Dave Young
dyoung at redhat.com
Thu Feb 4 16:41:15 PST 2016
On 02/04/16 at 11:56am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb, at 07:09:03PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > Consider the original code path, maybe change it to efi_kexec_setup will
> > be better to remind people? Or something else like a wraper function with
> > similar name..
>
> Possibly. I had considered adding a new efi_enabled() bit for
> KEXEC_BOOT, but I'm worried that'll just encourage more uses.
>
> The best approach is going to be to see whether we can reduce the uses
> of efi_setup and the associated special code. Once we've completed
> that exercise, we can think about the best name for this variable.
Ok, thanks.
>
> > For building ACPI tables we need do it in kernel instead of kexec-tools
> > because of kexec_file_load for secure boot case so we still need a conditional
> > code path for kexec..
>
> Note that it may not be necessary to build any ACPI tables at all,
> provided that things like acpi_get_table() fail gracefully for kexec.
> I'm assuming that's the problem that you discovered when writing this
> patch.
>
> And yes, I don't expect you can build the ACPI table from userspace,
> but it should at least be possible to do it in setup_boot_parameters()
> or so when you setup the EFI table pointers (efi.config_tables), etc.
> I think that would be a natural home for this feature.
Thing is we support both kexec_load and kexec_file_load, if we do something
in kernel loader we will need do same in userspace kexec-tools as well.
Another way is we probably can retain the boot service areas for kexec
boot, but yes it is another special handling for kexec :(. Is this way
better to you?
Thanks
Dave
More information about the kexec
mailing list