[PATCH] x86/efi: skip bgrt init for kexec reboot
Matt Fleming
matt at codeblueprint.co.uk
Thu Feb 4 03:56:56 PST 2016
On Thu, 04 Feb, at 07:09:03PM, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Consider the original code path, maybe change it to efi_kexec_setup will
> be better to remind people? Or something else like a wraper function with
> similar name..
Possibly. I had considered adding a new efi_enabled() bit for
KEXEC_BOOT, but I'm worried that'll just encourage more uses.
The best approach is going to be to see whether we can reduce the uses
of efi_setup and the associated special code. Once we've completed
that exercise, we can think about the best name for this variable.
> For building ACPI tables we need do it in kernel instead of kexec-tools
> because of kexec_file_load for secure boot case so we still need a conditional
> code path for kexec..
Note that it may not be necessary to build any ACPI tables at all,
provided that things like acpi_get_table() fail gracefully for kexec.
I'm assuming that's the problem that you discovered when writing this
patch.
And yes, I don't expect you can build the ACPI table from userspace,
but it should at least be possible to do it in setup_boot_parameters()
or so when you setup the EFI table pointers (efi.config_tables), etc.
I think that would be a natural home for this feature.
> Also I'm not sure how to rebuild ACPI tables, it is easy or hard. Let me
> checking the detail and think more about it.
Thanks.
More information about the kexec
mailing list