linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi,

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.  
> > The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is 
> > meaningless.
> > 
> > This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end 
> > of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree.  I've added the patch's 
> > author and Andrew to the cc.
> > 
> > How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?
> 
> These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a 
> problem.

What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy
of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
in the next hour or so).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20130321/bdd5da6d/attachment.sig>