linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:

> I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.  
> The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is 
> meaningless.
> 
> This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end 
> of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree.  I've added the patch's 
> author and Andrew to the cc.
> 
> How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?
> 

These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a 
problem.

If the patchset is reintroduced, please keep this build failure in the 
back of your mind, thanks.