[RFC] Kdump and memory error handling
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Thu May 12 18:22:44 EDT 2011
"K.Prasad" <prasad at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Hi All,
> We've been trying to study and improve the kdump behaviour when
> a panic is triggered due to an unrecoverable memory error causing a
> machine check exception (MCE) followed by a kernel panic.
>
> In this context we foresee a few issues in capturing kdump and would
> like to receive comments about the ways to handle them.
>
> Probable Issues when capturing coredump through kdump following a memory
> error
> ---------------------------
> - First, a coredump of the memory from the crashing kernel isn't really
> helpful in debugging the crash that was caused due to a faulty memory.
> Collecting the same has some of the problems illustrated below. It should
> therefore suffice to let the user know the reason of the crash
> rather than provide a complete dump of the memory.
>
> For this, a 'slim' yet crash-tool readable coredump containing:
> - message about the cause (such as crash due to unrecoverable memory error)
> in the coredump's elf-note section.
> - and no data from the memory of the 'crashing' kernel (their elf
> sections can be reduced to zero length).
> may be suitable.
>
> - Alternatively, if the kdump kernel decides to capture the coredump,
> its attempts to read the faulty memory location may lead to subsequent
> faults in the context of kdump kernel with fatal consequences. This
> may either be avoided by:
>
> a) Pass the address of the corrupt memory location to the kdump kernel
> and skip reading that location while creating the vmcore. This needs
> an instance of 'struct mce' (from the 'crashing' kernel), which
> already contains the faulty memory address (in the physical address
> form, which should be confirmed using the IA32_MCi_MISC[8:6] bits stored
> in 'misc' field of 'struct mce') to be populated inside the elf
> (-notes?) section.
>
> b) Use modified copy applications (such as a modified 'cp' command)
> that can map the /dev/oldmem into user-space and then initiate the
> creation of vmcore. In this method, the user-space process performing
> the copy will receive a SIGBUS while consuming the faulty memory (through
> INT18 -> do_machine_check) but it must be modified to be resilient to the
> signal, while intelligently skipping to the subsequent memory location
> for further copying. Meanwhile the data for the faulty memory location
> can be represented using 'zero-ed' data and the vmcore enhanced to
> indicate the cause of the crash as one resulting from a fatal MCE.
>
> Any thoughts/suggestions?
In practice this all works for me.
I have received several crash dumps where there was an mce error.
I admit I have my userspace configured to just grab the dmesg from the
kernel log and not do a full crash dump. So in that sense I am already
a slim crash dump.
But in practice with real hardware errors it is working today without
kernel changes.
Eric
More information about the kexec
mailing list