[PATCH] hostapd: Don't force HT Mixed Mode for non-GF STAs

Helmut Schaa helmut.schaa
Wed Mar 16 03:07:50 PDT 2011

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jouni Malinen <j at w1.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:41:34PM +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Jouni Malinen <j at w1.fi> wrote:
>> > Or well, would
>> > be even better, if the comment about the function were to be fixed to
>> > match the implementation.
>> Could you elaborate please?
> The function documentation has this to say about mixed mode:
> Set to 3 (HT mixed mode) when one or more non-HT STAs are associated
> ? ?(currently non-GF HT station is considered as non-HT STA also)
> The second line of that is not the case anymore after your patch if I
> understood it correctly.

Right. I was confused somehow ;)

>> However, since we mask out the STA HT caps with our own HT
>> caps during association every GF capable STA would appear as non-GF
>> capable STA and as such would force the non-GF-STAs-present flag
>> to be set.
> OK, that seems to cover the case. I think it would be useful to review
> all the flags at some point and document this type of special cases for
> hostapd_ht_operation_update().

Makes sense, yes. I also have some stuff pending for the STA HT caps
masking but haven't found time to send it out yet ...

> Anyway, I applied your patch (with the
> now obsolete line removed from function documentation).

Thanks a lot Jouni.


More information about the Hostap mailing list