[PATCH] dbus: shuffle property description struct members

[Jouni Malinen]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:01:29PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> So we can put the access permissions before the getters/setters
> and make it look prettier.

Why would we even need the separate access permission (enum
dbus_prop_access)? That can be determined from getter/setter function
pointers and seems to be just added extra complexity and source of human
errors. As such, instead of applying this reordering patch, I just
removed the access variable completely.

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA