Problem with BSS properties

Witold Sowa witold.sowa
Sat Dec 26 04:18:49 PST 2009

Jouni Malinen pisze:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 05:07:17PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
>> If we really want a complete D-Bus interface, we *have* to keep both old
>> + new around to take a difference between the two and push out the
>> PropertiesChanged signal.  I don't really know what Jouni will think
>> about that, but I don't see any other way to get a complete change list
>> (including IEs, which are the major memory user).
>> While IEs are nice to have, if Jouni is really concerned about memory
>> usage we can ignore IE changes for now and just do limited set of
>> properties.  But eventually I think we pretty much need everything.
> This really has to be a configurable option, i.e., wpa_supplicant will
> need to work without requiring there to be two copies of full scan
> results in memory. I haven't checked D-Bus resource requirements in
> general, but unless shown otherwise, I would assume it can be used in
> relatively low-powered devices, too, and it could also be useful to have
> an option to disable the scan results PropertiesChanged signal while
> still leaving in some other parts of D-Bus code.
> Of course this does not apply to any of the modern laptop/desktop
> systems where 200 kB of memory is not really anything and as such, I
> have nothing against wpa_supplicant doing the comparisons in general as
> long as it does not break some of the other cases where wpa_supplicant
> is used.
So lets add a config option to enable this comparison and add a comment
saying that is useful feature but pose a risk of additional 200kB memory

More information about the Hostap mailing list