wpa_cli event handling
Paul Fox
pgf
Fri Jan 6 07:49:48 PST 2006
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 04:55, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:50:41AM -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> > > i would think that passing an (optional) identifier of some sort
> > > from wpa_supplicant (via wpa_cli) to the event handler would make
> > > this cleaner. i'm picturing something similar to the pcmcia
> > > "scheme" ID: a stanza in the wpa_supplicant config file would
> > > include a "scheme=xxx" line (e.g. "scheme = home", "scheme =
> > > work", "scheme = use_ZCIP"). (and of course many network stanzas
> > > might reference the same scheme ID.) if the scheme (or whatever
> > > it's called) parameter were present in the config, it would be
> > > passed as a new third argument to the action script
> >
> > I don't have anything against adding something like this if there is
> > enough interest on it and someone would really use it. This means
> > changing an event message from wpa_supplicant, so the accepted strings
> > would likely be quite limited in what is allowed (e.g., just
> > alpha-numeric characters and underscore; no spaces etc.).
>
> If you do this, please just export variables to the shell instead of appending
> them as arguments.
>
> This allows us to remove/add variables at will instead of fixing them to arg1
> ACTION, arg2 SSID, arg3 ENCTYPE, etc etc
good point.
jouni -- i would definitely use this feature. i took a look at adding
it myself the other day, so i could send you a patch, but quickly realized
that i'd almost certainly get it wrong, which would probably worse
for you than not helping at all. :-)
(and limiting the acceptable strings for the scheme id is fine, of course.
alphanumeric and even length-limited would be fine.)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at brightstareng.com
More information about the Hostap
mailing list