Symbol/Nortel 4123 PCI Adapter - Port orinoco module to hosta p
Tue Aug 19 02:13:23 PDT 2003
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jouni Malinen [mailto:jkmaline at cc.hut.fi]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August 2003 04:22
> An: hostap at shmoo.com
> Betreff: Re: Symbol/Nortel 4123 PCI Adapter - Port orinoco
> module to hosta p
> You cannot use a IEEE 802.11 device that operates as a client that is
> associated to an AP ("Managed"/"Infra" mode) to implement
> layer2 bridge.
> IEEE 802.11 standard frames do not allow the source MAC address be
> changed in the frames sent by that device.
Ok, I didn't know that.
> However, you do not need to use "Master" (AP) mode for bridging; you
> could also use WDS links without normal AP functionality.
> This may even
> work with Lucent/Orinoco-based cards. At least, I have been
> able to use
> Host AP driver with Lucent WaveLAN card to send and receive
> standard WDS
> frames ('iwconfig wlan0 mode Repeater' and then add WDS links with
> iwpriv wds_add command). This does not require Host AP mode.
That sounds like the best solution, but
1. I've got a Nortel/Symbol Card. I read about reports people use this card
succesful in managed mode, but nothing about repeater mode. Do you think
this will work.
2. This leads me to the problem, why I actually posted to this list. My Card
is in a PCI adapter which is NOT with a PLX chip.
Here again the belonging part of my first post:
>> I want to run the Nortel PCI Card (4123) as a member of a bridge(, but
>> symbol support in the Orinoco driver seems not to be ready for this).
>> I tried with the module available at
>> <http://www.traum404.de/download/index.html> .
>> As far as I can see (with my very basic C knowledge) this module consists
>> only a few lines of code to initial the pcmcia card, and then let the
>> Orinoco driver do its work.
>> The only thing which has to be changed in the Orinoco driver are two
>> of code in Orinoco.c and Orinoco.h.
>> void hermes_struct_init(hermes_t *hw, ulong address,
>> int io_space, int reg_spacing)
>> hw->iobase = address;
>> > hw->iobase1 = 0;
>> > hw->iobase2 = 0;
>> hw->io_space = io_space;
>> hw->reg_spacing = reg_spacing;
>> hw->inten = 0x0;
>> So my hope is, this could be as easy for the hostap driver.
>> Please don't understand me wrong! I don't ask you for writing a driver
>> me! But I can't do it and I hope to hear from you either
>> "Forget it! The hostap has got nothing in common with the Orinoco driver,
>> the Nortel_pci module is useless for the hostap driver"
>> "No problem! Just ask a friend with C knowledge to have a look at it and
>> change ..........."
(End of quote)
It would be very nice, if anybody could give me an assessment for this.
> Why do you think that masquerading on AP1 would not be OK?
Masquerading ervery connection 2 times is just needless and I worry it will
fail with some protocols like ftp or messengers. Ok, I know no concretely
reason, ist just a fear.
> Jouni Malinen PGP
> id EFC895FA
> HostAP mailing list
> HostAP at shmoo.com
More information about the Hostap