How good is HD supposed to be?

[artisticforge .]

hello

the human eye is still not digital, give them time. By not being
digital the idea
of frames per second still holds. It is the frames per second that
provide the human
eye with the persistence of vision, the illusion of motion.



On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Dave Liquorice <allsorts at howhill.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:08:38 +0300, Vangelis forthnet wrote:
>
>>> In addition a high bit-rate (8000kbps) 1920x1080, interlaced at 25fps,
>>> full HD encode is generated, but has not yet been made available.
>>
>> but it has not yet been released publicly...
>> At ca. 8Mps, those will be really huge files!
>
> 3.2 GB/hour roughly. The current 2.5 Mbps (ish) uses about 1 GB/hr.
>
>> NB hvfhd DOES NOT OFFER HIGHER RESOLUTION (CLARITY), only doubled
>> framerate (25FPS x2), which results in smoother scenes where motion is
>> involved!
>
> How does repeating frames improve smoothness of movement? Or does this
> encode upscale each field(*) and encode that to increase the temporal
> resolution?
>
> (*) If good ole 25 frames/50 fields per second has any relevance in the
> digital world.
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Dave.




-- 
terry l. ridder ><>