[PATCH 2/2] PBL: add oneshot helper for sha384 and sha512

[Michael Tretter]

On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:08:56 +0000, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On 2026-09-28 14:25, Michael Tretter wrote:
> > Similar to the oneshot helper for sha256, add helpers for sha384 and
> > sha512.
> > 
> > The helper functions don't use the ARMv8 Crypto Extensions, yet.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  include/crypto/pbl-sha.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/crypto/pbl-sha.h b/include/crypto/pbl-sha.h
> > index dbfb79647462..8a20e0a2b84b 100644
> > --- a/include/crypto/pbl-sha.h
> > +++ b/include/crypto/pbl-sha.h
> > @@ -28,7 +28,29 @@ int sha512_init(struct digest *desc);
> >  int sha512_update(struct digest *desc, const void *data, unsigned long len);
> >  int sha512_final(struct digest *desc, u8 *out);
> >  
> > +static inline void pbl_sha512(const void *buf, size_t len,
> > +			      u8 out[SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE])
> > +{
> > +	struct sha512_state state = { };
> > +	struct digest d = { .ctx = &state, .length = SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE };
> > +
> > +	sha512_init(&d);
> > +	sha512_update(&d, buf, len);
> > +	sha512_final(&d, out);
> > +}
> 
> Instead of making these static inline functions, could you follow the
> template in pbl/sha256.c to give future developers an idea how for
> example the crypto extensions should be implemented?

I implemented this as static inline to avoid the decision, if I should
add pbl/sha384.c and pbl/sha512.c modules, or if I should change
pbl/sha256.c to a more generic pbl/sha.c. I tend to the second option.
Do you have any preference?

Michael