bootm: fit-image: hash node name too strict
Marco Felsch
m.felsch at pengutronix.de
Mon Jan 6 23:37:18 PST 2025
Hi Sebastian,
On 25-01-07, Sebastian Groß wrote:
> Hello and a happy new year 2025 dear all,
thank you very much, you too :)
> I happened to have a fit-image which worked fine with u-boot and wanted to
> give it a try with barebox.
> Sadly I got yelled at for not having hashes for the kernel-1 `Image`
> provided in the fit-image.
>
> Grepping the source code for the error message pointed to `fit_verify_hash`
> and `of_get_child_by_name` with `hash at 1` or `hash-1`.
> Neither is required by u-boot as it looks only for `FIT_HASH_NODENAME` which
> is defined as `hash`.
According the spec [1] it should be named hash-<number>. Checking the
U-Boot doc folder it seems like 'hash' was used in the early days of FIT
images since there is only one file 'doc/usage/fit/howto.rst' which is
using the plain 'hash' node name.
[1] https://fitspec.osfw.foundation/#hash-nodes
> Since the image is build by uboot's mkimage I would expect the itb's to be
> compatible. Or am I missing something?
>
> Changing the following line in the `its`, ie. its build script
> ```
> - hash { algo = "${FIT_HASH_ALG}"; };
> + hash at 1 { algo = "${FIT_HASH_ALG}"; };
> ```
> made the fit-image work.
I can't find this line within the U-Boot src code. Can you provide a
link please?
> Perhaps another if-clause is required. Or some error message that states
> which property/string was searched for,
> since there were hashes in the image, but not where barebox expected them.
We could search for the legacy single 'hash' node name as well and print
a warning that this should be changed.
Regards,
Marco
>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian Groß
>
> --
> Sebastian Groß, B.Sc.
>
> emlix GmbH
> Headquarters: Berliner Str. 12, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
> Phone +49 (0)551 30664-0, e-mail info at emlix.com
> District Court of Goettingen, Registry Number HR B 3160
> Managing Directors: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke
> VAT ID No. DE 205 198 055
> Office Berlin: Panoramastr. 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
> Office Bonn: Bachstr. 6, 53115 Bonn, Germany
> http://www.emlix.com
>
> emlix - your embedded Linux partner
>
>
>
More information about the barebox
mailing list