[PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints

[Sascha Hauer]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:32:35 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk
> 
> The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
> a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
> no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints
      https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=e5a7137b3d1b (link may not be stable)

Best regards,
-- 
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>