[PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints

Ahmad Fatoum a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Mon Dec 8 02:32:35 PST 2025


printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk

The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
---
 include/printf.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/printf.h b/include/printf.h
index 58793bc067dc..3503b72c9e5e 100644
--- a/include/printf.h
+++ b/include/printf.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void __noreturn panic_no_stacktrace(const char *fmt, ...) __printf(1, 2);
 #define no_printf(fmt, ...)				\
 ({							\
 	if (0)						\
-		printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
+		printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
 	0;						\
 })
 
-- 
2.47.3




More information about the barebox mailing list