[PATCH] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Mon Dec 8 02:32:35 PST 2025
printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk
The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
---
include/printf.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/printf.h b/include/printf.h
index 58793bc067dc..3503b72c9e5e 100644
--- a/include/printf.h
+++ b/include/printf.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void __noreturn panic_no_stacktrace(const char *fmt, ...) __printf(1, 2);
#define no_printf(fmt, ...) \
({ \
if (0) \
- printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
0; \
})
--
2.47.3
More information about the barebox
mailing list