[PATCH 2/3] ARM: i.MX8M: esdctl: use common compatible to detect i.MX8M* DDRC

[Lucas Stach]

Am Dienstag, dem 07.02.2023 um 11:24 +0100 schrieb Marco Felsch:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On 23-02-06, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > All i.MX8M* DDRC nodes are compatible to "fsl,imx8m-ddrc". As the memory
> > size detection works the same on all of them, there is no need to match
> > the more specific compatible.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c | 8 +-------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c
> > index 043de477a77d..2a2bc5205301 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c
> > @@ -732,13 +732,7 @@ static __maybe_unused struct of_device_id imx_esdctl_dt_ids[] = {
> >  		.compatible = "fsl,vf610-ddrmc",
> >  		.data = &vf610_data
> >  	}, {
> > -		.compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ddrc",
> > -		.data = &imx8mq_data
> > -	}, {
> > -		.compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-ddrc",
> > -		.data = &imx8mn_data
> 
> The i.MX8M Nano uses a 16bit bus width according the data. I don't have
> the datasheet right now to check this. But this commit will change it to
> 32 bit, is this allowed?

Argh, thanks for catching that! This change was a bit overzealous.

Regards,
Lucas
> 
> Regards,
>   Marco
> 
> > -	}, {
> > -		.compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-ddrc",
> > +		.compatible = "fsl,imx8m-ddrc",
> >  		.data = &imx8mq_data
> >  	}, {
> >  		.compatible = "fsl,imx7d-ddrc",
> > -- 
> > 2.39.1
> > 
> > 
> >