[PATCH] commands: uptime: add note about caveats
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Wed Nov 2 01:50:17 PDT 2022
Normally timer overrun is not that much of a problem, because there
where it matters, we usually have an is_timeout() in the loop that reads
the timer often enough. This doesn't necessarily hold for the new uptime
command and basically anything can happen between subsequent calls and
if get_time_ns() is not called often enough during that time, we end up
with an inaccurate uptime. Mention this in the extended help text.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
---
Can be squashed into original commit.
---
commands/uptime.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/commands/uptime.c b/commands/uptime.c
index a9a8c650b698..d67538631c8f 100644
--- a/commands/uptime.c
+++ b/commands/uptime.c
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ static int do_uptime(int argc, char *argv[])
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_START(uptime)
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("This command formats the number of elapsed nanoseconds")
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("as measured with the current clocksource")
+BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("Note: Timekeeping is co-operative. If long running code does")
+BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("not use delay/is_timeout/get_time_ns/getchar functions")
+BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("timer may overrun resulting in incorrect results")
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_TEXT("Options:")
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_OPT ("-n", "output elapsed time in nanoseconds")
BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_END
--
2.30.2
More information about the barebox
mailing list