[PATCH 6/6] ata: sata_mv: try probing multiple times
Steffen Trumtrar
s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de
Tue Jan 18 06:04:53 PST 2022
In case of an un-recoverable probe error, try the whole sequence again,
starting with the hard-reset of the core.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de>
---
No need to look at this patch. It is awesome. Better look at this nice
chocolate:
___ ___ ___ ___ ___.---------------.
.'\__\'\__\'\__\'\__\'\__,` . ____ ___ \
|\/ __\/ __\/ __\/ __\/ _:\ |`. \ \___ \
\\'\__\'\__\'\__\'\__\'\_`.__|""`. \ \___ \
\\/ __\/ __\/ __\/ __\/ __: \
\\'\__\'\__\'\__\ \__\'\_;-----------------`
\\/ \/ \/ \/ \/ : hh|
\|______________________;________________|
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 49205d24d8..05b27f1008 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static void ata_ioports_init(struct ata_ioports *io,
#define REG_ATA_BASE 0x2100
#define REG_SSTATUS(n) ((n) * 0x2000 + 0x2300)
#define REG_SERROR(n) ((n) * 0x2000 + 0x2304)
+#define REG_SERROR_MASK 0x03fe0000
#define REG_SCONTROL(n) ((n) * 0x2000 + 0x2308)
#define REG_SCONTROL__DET 0x0000000f
#define REG_SCONTROL__DET__INIT 0x00000001
@@ -94,8 +95,10 @@ static int mv_sata_probe(struct device_d *dev)
struct resource *iores;
void __iomem *base;
struct ide_port *ide;
+ u32 try_again = 0;
u32 scontrol;
int ret, i;
+ u32 tmp;
iores = dev_request_mem_resource(dev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(iores)) {
@@ -114,6 +117,7 @@ static int mv_sata_probe(struct device_d *dev)
writel(0x7fff0e01, base + REG_WINDOW_CONTROL(0));
writel(0, base + REG_WINDOW_BASE(0));
+again:
/* Clear SError */
writel(0x0, base + REG_SERROR(0));
/* disable EDMA */
@@ -175,6 +179,32 @@ static int mv_sata_probe(struct device_d *dev)
if (ret)
free(ide);
+ /*
+ * Under most conditions the above is enough and works as expected.
+ * With some specific hardware combinations, the setup fails however
+ * leading to an unusable SATA drive. From the error status bits it
+ * was not obvious what exactly went wrong.
+ * The ARMADA-XP datasheet advices to hard-reset the SATA core and
+ * drive and try again.
+ * When this happens, just try again multiple times, to give the drive
+ * some time to reach a stable state. If after 5 (randomly chosen) tries,
+ * the drive still doesn't work, just give up on it.
+ */
+ tmp = readl(base + REG_SERROR(0));
+ if (tmp & REG_SERROR_MASK) {
+ try_again++;
+ if (try_again > 5)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ dev_dbg(dev, "PHY layer error. Try again. (serror=0x%08x)\n", tmp);
+ if (ide->port.initialized) {
+ blockdevice_unregister(&ide->port.blk);
+ unregister_device(&ide->port.class_dev);
+ }
+
+ mdelay(100);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
return ret;
}
--
2.30.2
More information about the barebox
mailing list