[PATCH 3/4] Revert "ARM: mmu: use client domain permissions to support ARMv7 eXecute Never"
Peter Rosin
peda at axentia.se
Sun Sep 19 00:50:56 PDT 2021
On 2021-09-19 09:06, Rouven Czerwinski wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> while this may break for your board, it fundamentally introduces the
> possibility to speculate out of the RAM area on speculation happy
I'm aware of that. For me, speculation is not an issue since *any*
rogue code running on the embedded device in question is a major fail.
Also, from the cover letter:
"I'm going to follow up with patches. I very much realize that
these patches are most likely not acceptable as-is, but I do
include them since they are probably the best description of
where the problems are."
> processors. Are you calling into SAMA5D3 ROM code somewhere? If so an
*I* am not calling anything. Maybe the board code for sama5d3xek is,
but I have no idea as it's not "my" code. How can I figure out if it
does?
Cheers,
Peter
> exception can be added similar to the handling for the HAB code
> (arch/arm/cpu/mmu_early.c):
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HABV4) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_IMX6))
> map_region(0x0, SZ_1M, PMD_SECT_DEF_CACHED);
>
> which allows calls into the NXP boot ROM to retrieve the HAB status.
More information about the barebox
mailing list