[PATCH] nandtest: Add more fields when bad byte found
Trent Piepho
trent.piepho at igorinstitute.com
Mon Oct 11 12:07:25 PDT 2021
This can help to determine what is causing the problem. E.g., is the
bad byte always in the same eraseblock? Is it always 513 bytes into a
page with a hardware ECC chunk size of 512 bytes?
Example before and after (error at absolute address 123456 with 128kB
eraseblock and 2kB page sizes):
Byte 0xe240 is 12 should be 34
Block 0x1 byte 0xe240 (page 0x1c offset 0x240) is 0x12 should be 0x34
Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <trent.piepho at igorinstitute.com>
---
commands/nandtest.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/commands/nandtest.c b/commands/nandtest.c
index 1bb59c7fd..4a7db9cc7 100644
--- a/commands/nandtest.c
+++ b/commands/nandtest.c
@@ -169,8 +169,10 @@ static int erase_and_write(loff_t ofs, unsigned char *data,
printf("\ncompare failed. seed %d\n", seed);
for (i = 0; i < meminfo.erasesize; i++) {
if (data[i] != rbuf[i])
- printf("Byte 0x%x is %02x should be %02x\n",
- i, rbuf[i], data[i]);
+ printf("Block 0x%llx byte 0x%0x (page 0x%x offset 0x%x) is %02x should be %02x\n",
+ div64_ul(ofs, meminfo.erasesize), i,
+ i / meminfo.writesize, i % meminfo.writesize,
+ rbuf[i], data[i]);
}
return ret;
}
--
2.31.1
More information about the barebox
mailing list