[RFC PATCH] usb: gadget: dfu: Wrap fs operation in workqueue
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Sun Jan 31 14:34:07 EST 2021
Hello Jules,
On 29.01.21 11:51, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Hello Jules,
>>
>> On 27.01.21 17:49, Jules Maselbas wrote:
>>> File system operation shouldn't be executed in a poller. Use
>>> a workqueue to delay filesystem operation to command context.
>>>
>>> This is an RFC, extra work must be done to properly handle error
>>> cases and dfu cleanup.
>>
>> I erroneously thought the poller is within the DFU bits. I wonder what
>> side-effect moving the whole USB gadget polling into a workqueue would
>> have. In that case, we wouldn't need to any changes for DFU itself.
>>
> If I understood correctly you're suggesting to wrap the entire dfu
> gadget inside a poller. I have not tried this and it might work.
> However wrapping each fs operation allow the dfu gadget to respond
> to GET_STATUS queries will erase/write operation are on-going.
To allow running in the "background", the UDC calls into the gadget code
in a poller. I was wondering if replacing that poller with a workqueue
would just make the problem go away, not for DFU. It now know it wouldn't:
Work queues work in shell context and doing console stuff in shell context
(via ttyACM gadget) is not a wise choice. So please dismiss my suggestion ^^.
>
> Jules
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list