[PATCH] PPC: request a consistent memory layout
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Mon May 8 22:40:31 PDT 2017
Hi Jürgen,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Using the memory test command will crash barebox, because it tests the
> area where the stack is located for the PPC architecture.
>
> On PPC the stack is below the barebox binary. Below the stack the malloc
> area is located. Until this change some routines used the macros
> from memory_layout.h, some other calculated their values by their
> own - which resulted into an unrequested and unprotected stack area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Borleis <jbe at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/cpu-mpc5200.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/Kconfig b/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/Kconfig
> index d0f5d78f4..fef661b0f 100644
> --- a/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/Kconfig
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ config ARCH_MPC5200
> config MPC5xxx
> bool
> depends on MACH_PHYCORE_MPC5200B_TINY || MMC12
> - select HAVE_CONFIGURABLE_MEMORY_LAYOUT
> default y
>
> menu "Board specific settings"
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/cpu-mpc5200.c b/arch/ppc/mach-mpc5xxx/cpu-mpc5200.c
This files doesn't exist in master. Could you rebase on a current tree?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list