[PATCH 00/62] Update UBI

[Teresa Remmet]

Hello Sascha,

Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> Hi Teresa,
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Teresa Remmet wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > this series is more or less just a cherry-pick of the UBI patches
> > from kernel to version v4.6. Rework was need for some patches to make
> > them apply and work for barebox.
> > 
> > After applying this series UBI is much more noisy while attaching.
> > I am not sure if this is wanted. But could be solved in a seperate patch.
> 
> It doesn't seem to get more noisy here, here is a log from a new/old
> UBI:
> 
> ubi0: scanning is finished
> ubi0: registering /dev/nand0.root.ubi
> ubi0: attached mtd0 (name "nand0.root", size 1010 MiB) to ubi0
> ubi0: PEB size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB), LEB size: 126976 bytes
> ubi0: min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048/2048, sub-page size 2048
> ubi0: VID header offset: 2048 (aligned 2048), data offset: 4096
> ubi0: good PEBs: 8076, bad PEBs: 4, corrupted PEBs: 0
> ubi0: user volume: 0, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 128
> ubi0: max/mean erase counter: 1/1, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 1694817280
> ubi0: available PEBs: 7914, total reserved PEBs: 162, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 156
> 
> UBI: attaching mtd0 to ubi0
> UBI: scanning is finished
> registering /dev/ubi0
> UBI: attached mtd0 (name "nand0.root", size 1011 MiB) to ubi0
> UBI: PEB size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB), LEB size: 126976 bytes
> UBI: min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048/2048, sub-page size 2048
> UBI: VID header offset: 2048 (aligned 2048), data offset: 4096
> UBI: good PEBs: 8088, bad PEBs: 4, corrupted PEBs: 0
> UBI: user volume: 0, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 128
> UBI: max/mean erase counter: 1/1, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 1694817280
> UBI: available PEBs: 7929, total reserved PEBs: 159, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 155
> 
> What changes do you see in the messages?

Mhmm I must have mixed something up. Sorry I can't see it now, too.

> 
> I applied the series to -next for now, let's see if this reveals any new
> UBI problems.


Ok, thanks.

Regards,
Teresa

> 
> Sascha
>