[REGRESSION BUG] at91 is broken on barebox
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Mon Jan 5 02:23:39 PST 2015
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 10:51:43AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> HI,
>
> since the switch to ERR_PTR & co
>
> for dev_get_resource_by_name & others the at91 is broken
>
> as on barebox we use a 1:1 mapping and the check of the IS_ERR is
> ((unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
>
> but on at91 the PIT and so on are at 0xfffffd30 so on always seen as
> an error
Damn :(
Since dev_get_resource_by_name returns a struct resource pointer it
shouldn't be broken, right? What's broken should be:
dev_get_mem_region_by_name
dev_request_mem_region_by_name
dev_request_mem_region
>
> so can we revert the commit on
>
> ommit 92cc1b1f9e3363046583962859a3a8c054f4b94d
Since these commits touch so many files I'm not sure we can simply
revert these commits. All drivers that check for IS_ERR() from the above
functions that were introduced after the commits to revert would have to
be changed aswell.
The functions should still work, but the error check with IS_ERR() does
not, right? So as a stop gap solution we could drop the error check from
the affected drivers and as the next step change the prototype of the
affected functions to something like:
int dev_request_mem_region(struct device_d *dev, int num, void __iomem **base);
Which drivers are affected anyway?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list