[PATCH 0/8] low level initialisation for ar2313
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Fri Jun 21 03:23:19 EDT 2013
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:25:25AM +0400, antonynpavlov at gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:30:17 +0200
> Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi Oleksij, Antony,
> >
> > I'm fine with this series. Antony, do you have comments?
>
> The series looks good!
>
> But in the last minute I made a small fix for the "MIPS: pbl: add pbl_sleep macro" patch.
>
> It's a shame, but generated label inside assembly macros are not "local" (at least I have not found how to make them local in my toolchain).
>
> As the user of the pbl_sleep can use generated label "1" (this label already used in pbl_sleep), there can be some painful side effects, e.g.
>
> 1: // user's generated label
>
> ... // some user code
>
> pbl_sleep t1 100
>
> ... // another user code
>
> b 1b // jump to the back label "1"
>
>
> Inside the pbl_sleep macro we have one more "1" label, so the jump instruction of the
> example transfer control not to the user's label "1" but to label "1" inside pbl_sleep.
>
> So I propose a ad-hoc solution.
>
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pbl_macros.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pbl_macros.h
> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
> .set push
> .set noreorder
> li \reg, \count
> -1:
> - bgtz \reg, 1b
> +254:
> + bgtz \reg, 254b
> addi \reg, -1
> .set pop
> .endm
Yeah, I noticed the same problem some time ago and came up with the same
solution. I'm not aware of a better way to do this.
>
> The programmers are lazy (at least many of them), they like short names "1", "2"
> and "254" is very long name, so the conflict is not expected.
> To prevent conflicts like this we can make a convention "don't use generated labels 200-255 in you assembler pbl code".
>
> Is there a need for series/patch reposting for fixing the issue?
Yes, please post what you want me to apply on -next.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list