[PATCH] of: add ranges address translation for default bus

Sascha Hauer s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Jun 13 08:48:33 EDT 2013

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:38:19AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 06/13/13 11:25, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:33:06AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>I started merging already, and from what I can see we should just remove
> >>the spinlocks and OF_DYNAMIC stuff (but leave of_node_get/_put as stubs)
> >
> >Sounds like a plan. Functions existing both in barebox and Linux should
> >behave the same way. However, if Linux turns out to do something silly
> >or (for our usecase) too bloated, we shouldn't do the same just because
> >Linux does it.
> >
> >I want to keep the Linux list usage in the devicetree, so they won't be
> >really in sync.
> Ok, I started converting and doing it in a clean way is kind of tricky.
> First of all, allyesconfig doesn't build - so it is hard to find and
> re-build all users of current of_* functions.
> If you want to stick with list usage, it will end up with converting
> instead of just move current functions out of the way, import Linux
> OF, and switch users to that functions.
> I will have a look at it, find users/abusers of current API and see
> how much we can merge.
> You also want to stick with of_set_* and friends within base.c or
> move them out to some other source file where all set/modify functions
> will sit in?

I'm fine with moving the set/modify kernel to another file, no problem.


Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

More information about the barebox mailing list