[PATCH 7/8] ppc 8xxx: core DDR driver functions

[Renaud Barbier]

On 02/06/2013 16:44, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:54:03PM +0100, Renaud Barbier wrote:
>> This file is imported from U-Boot as is.
>>
>> This code provides the 8xxx memory controller core driver interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Renaud Barbier <renaud.barbier at ge.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/ppc/ddr-8xxx/main.c |  667 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 667 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/ppc/ddr-8xxx/main.c
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * fsl_ddr_sdram() -- this is the main function to be called by
>> + *	initdram() in the board file.
>> + *
>> + * It returns amount of memory configured in bytes.
>> + */
>> +phys_size_t fsl_ddr_sdram(void)
>> +{
>
> THe behaviour of this function is defined by:
>
> CONFIG_BUFFER_SIZE
> CONFIG_CHIP_SELECT_QUAD_CAPABLE
> CONFIG_CHIP_SELECTS_PER_CTRL
> CONFIG_DDR_ECC
> CONFIG_DDR_SPD
> CONFIG_DIMM_SLOTS_PER_CTLR
> CONFIG_E500MC
> CONFIG_E6500
> CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER
> CONFIG_FSL_DDR1
> CONFIG_FSL_DDR2
> CONFIG_FSL_DDR3
> CONFIG_FSL_DDR_FIRST_SLOT_QUAD_CAPABLE
> CONFIG_FSL_DDR_INTERACTIVE
> CONFIG_FSL_SDRAM_TYPE
> CONFIG_HWCONFIG
> CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED
> CONFIG_MEM_INIT_VALUE
> CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS
> CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
> CONFIG_SPD_EEPROM
> CONFIG_SYS_DDR_RAW_TIMING
> CONFIG_SYS_DIMM_SLOTS_PER_CTLR
> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR_VER
> CONFIG_SYS_IMMR
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR2_ADDR
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR3_ADDR
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR_ADDR
> CONFIG_SYS_NUM_DDR_CTLRS
>
> Some of these a board specific, others are SoC specific, but all are
> input parameters to this function. The prototype should really be:
>
> phys_size_t mpc8xxx_setup_ddr(struct mpc8xxx_ddr_params *)

Actually there is already a structure "memctl_options_s" that could be 
either extended or point to a board option structure. It is updated by 
the board specific function: fsl_ddr_board_options.

>
> (or maybe mpc8xxx_setup_ddr1/2/3 to be able to let the linker throw away
> some unused code)
>
> Code written in CPP rather than C was one of the major reasons why I
> originally wrote barebox, so please let's not reintroduce this.
>
> Sascha
>