[PATCH 2/3] Refactor malloc.h.
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Mon Jun 3 03:26:04 EDT 2013
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Masaki Muranaka wrote:
> Some functions should be defined in stdlib.h or unistd.h.
> ---
> include/malloc.h | 8 +++-----
> include/malloc_isoc.h | 11 +++++++++++
> include/malloc_posix.h | 8 ++++++++
> include/stdlib.h | 1 +
> include/unistd.h | 6 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/malloc_isoc.h
> create mode 100644 include/malloc_posix.h
> create mode 100644 include/unistd.h
>
> diff --git a/include/malloc.h b/include/malloc.h
> index 7b9b062..9554597 100644
> --- a/include/malloc.h
> +++ b/include/malloc.h
> @@ -5,20 +5,18 @@
>
> /* Public routines */
>
> -void* malloc(size_t);
> -void free(void*);
> -void* realloc(void*, size_t);
> +#include <malloc_isoc.h>
> +#include <malloc_posix.h>
> +
> void* memalign(size_t, size_t);
> void* vallocc(size_t);
> void* pvalloc(size_t);
> -void* calloc(size_t, size_t);
> void cfree(void*);
> int malloc_trim(size_t);
> size_t malloc_usable_size(void*);
> void malloc_stats(void);
> int mallopt(int, int);
> struct mallinfo mallinfo(void);
> -void *sbrk(ptrdiff_t increment);
Wouldn't it be nicer to move the prototypes to unistd.h / stdlib.h
instead of adding new files?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list