[PATCH 1/7] at91: add test commamd to emulate bootrom boot
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Sat Jan 19 06:42:31 EST 2013
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/boot_test_cmd.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/boot_test_cmd.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index fcba7fb..e703b3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -483,4 +483,10 @@ config CMD_AT91MUX
> bool "at91mux dump command"
> default y
>
> +config CONFIG_CMD_AT91_BOOT_TEST
> + bool "at91_boot_test"
> + help
> + allow to upload a boot binary to sram and execute it
> + usefull to test bootstrap or barebox lowlevel init
s/usefull/useful/
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> index 53b4dd8..4404d23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> obj-y += setup.o clock.o gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_AT91_BOOT_TEST) += boot_test_cmd.o
>
> lowlevel_init-y = at91sam926x_lowlevel_init.o
> lowlevel_init-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200) = at91rm9200_lowlevel_init.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/boot_test_cmd.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/boot_test_cmd.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..02e16fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/boot_test_cmd.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2012 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> + *
> + * Under GPLv2 only
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <command.h>
> +#include <libbb.h>
> +#include <getopt.h>
> +#include <fs.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +static int do_at91_boot_test(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + int opt;
> + u32 *buf32;
> + void *buf;
> + u32 jump = 0;
> + int fd;
> + int ret = 1;
> + char *sram = "/dev/sram0";
> + u32 read_size, write_size;
> + u32 tmp = 0;
> +
> + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "j:s:")) > 0) {
> + switch (opt) {
> + case 'j':
> + jump = simple_strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
> + break;
Without the 'j' option given the code will jump to 0x0. Is this
intended?
> + case 's':
> + sram = optarg;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (argc < optind + 1)
> + return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> +
> + buf32 = buf = read_file(argv[optind], &read_size);
> + if (!buf)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + write_size = buf32[5];
> +
> + printf("size of the size %d\n", read_size);
> + printf("size to load in sram %d\n", write_size);
> +
> + if (write_size > read_size) {
> + printf("file smaller than requested sram loading size (%d < %d)\n", write_size, read_size);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + fd = open(sram, O_WRONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + printf("could not open %s: %s\n", sram, errno_str());
> + ret = fd;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + while(write_size) {
> + tmp = write(fd, buf, write_size);
> + if (tmp < 0) {
> + perror("write");
> + goto err_open;
> + }
> + buf += tmp;
> + write_size -= tmp;
> + }
> +
> + shutdown_barebox();
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "mov pc, %0\n"
> + :
> + : "r"(jump)
> + :);
Is this inline assemble needed? Why not
void (*jump)(void);
jump();
> +
> +err_open:
> + close(fd);
> +err:
> + free(buf);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_START(at91_boot_test)
> +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_USAGE("at91_boot_test [-j <jump addr>] [-s <sram>] file\n")
> +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_SHORT("upload the binary to sram and jump as will do the romcode\n")
> +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_END
> +
> +BAREBOX_CMD_START(at91_boot_test)
> + .cmd = do_at91_boot_test,
> + .usage = "upload the binary to sram and jump as will do the romcode",
> + BAREBOX_CMD_HELP(cmd_at91_boot_test_help)
> +BAREBOX_CMD_END
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list