[PATCH 2/2] complete: abstract path complete

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 12:38 Tue 11 Sep     , Alexander Aring wrote:
>    Hi,
> 
>    I prefer this implementation than the older one, because it check on
>    executable(Maybe we add a attribute for that or check on shebang) file and
>    call found with the full path.
>    I was thinking about to put this as RFC..., because I don't have really a
>    usecase for this.
>    Some commands can do a autocompletion for files that are in $PATH, when
>    this is needed.
> 
>    The naming things, I don't like the name, too. I was doing the naming like
>    the others functions.
>    I will send a v2 with a better name and functionheader
do not like it is not a justification to move or rename it

IT remember the shit that did TI guys on the kernel rename and move stuff
because x or y do notlinke the naming

Best Regards,
J.