[PATCH 1/3] sandbox-unaligned: better usement of ifdef

Sascha Hauer s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue Sep 11 03:51:41 EDT 2012


On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:30:43AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> GCC versions below 4.6 don't set __BYTE_ORDER__
> with __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__. So it's better to use
> __BYTE_ORDER and __LITTLE_ENDIAN instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring at gmail.com>

These fix some warnings on a 32bit sandbox build also for me.

Thanks, applied.

Sascha

> ---
>  arch/sandbox/include/asm/unaligned.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sandbox/include/asm/unaligned.h b/arch/sandbox/include/asm/unaligned.h
> index 07c1ae4..d02da6e 100644
> --- a/arch/sandbox/include/asm/unaligned.h
> +++ b/arch/sandbox/include/asm/unaligned.h
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  #include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
>  #include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
>  
> -#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> +#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
>  #define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
>  #define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
>  #else
> -- 
> 1.7.12
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



More information about the barebox mailing list