[PATCH 1/2] block: propagate error code from block_get
Roberto Nibali
rnibali at gmail.com
Thu May 31 08:45:49 EDT 2012
Hi Sascha
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> common/block.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/block.c b/common/block.c
> index 4253fc4..437dc95 100644
> --- a/common/block.c
> +++ b/common/block.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void *block_get(struct block_device *blk, int
> block)
> int ret;
>
> if (block >= blk->num_blocks)
> - return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
>
> outdata = block_get_cached(blk, block);
> if (outdata)
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void *block_get(struct block_device *blk, int
> block)
>
> ret = block_cache(blk, block);
> if (ret)
> - return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> outdata = block_get_cached(blk, block);
> if (!outdata)
> @@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static ssize_t block_read(struct cdev *cdev, void
> *buf, size_t count,
> size_t now = BLOCKSIZE(blk) - (offset & mask);
> void *iobuf = block_get(blk, block);
>
> - if (!iobuf)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(iobuf))
> + return PTR_ERR(iobuf);
>
> now = min(count, now);
>
> @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static ssize_t block_read(struct cdev *cdev, void
> *buf, size_t count,
> while (blocks) {
> void *iobuf = block_get(blk, block);
>
> - if (!iobuf)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(iobuf))
> + return PTR_ERR(iobuf);
>
> memcpy(buf, iobuf, BLOCKSIZE(blk));
> buf += BLOCKSIZE(blk);
> @@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ static ssize_t block_read(struct cdev *cdev, void
> *buf, size_t count,
> if (count) {
> void *iobuf = block_get(blk, block);
>
> - if (!iobuf)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(iobuf))
> + return PTR_ERR(iobuf);
>
> memcpy(buf, iobuf, count);
> }
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int block_put(struct block_device *blk, const
> void *buf, int block)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data = block_get(blk, block);
> - if (!data)
> + if (IS_ERR(data))
> BUG();
>
> memcpy(data, buf, 1 << blk->blockbits);
> @@ -270,8 +270,8 @@ static ssize_t block_write(struct cdev *cdev, const
> void *buf, size_t count,
>
> now = min(count, now);
>
> - if (!iobuf)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(iobuf))
> + return PTR_ERR(iobuf);
>
> memcpy(iobuf + (offset & mask), buf, now);
> ret = block_put(blk, iobuf, block);
> @@ -299,8 +299,8 @@ static ssize_t block_write(struct cdev *cdev, const
> void *buf, size_t count,
> if (count) {
> void *iobuf = block_get(blk, block);
>
> - if (!iobuf)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(iobuf))
> + return PTR_ERR(iobuf);
>
> memcpy(iobuf, buf, count);
> ret = block_put(blk, iobuf, block);
> --
> 1.7.10
>
>
Compile and run-time tested; results in a proper error message propagated
by the block layer:
imx-esdhc at imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
mci at mci0: Reading block 2560 failed with -110
block_cache: blk->ops->read returned -110
Therefore:
Tested-by: Roberto Nibali <rnibali at gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roberto Nibali <rnibali at gmail.com>
Cheers
Roberto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/attachments/20120531/cc67a60b/attachment.html>
More information about the barebox
mailing list